This weekend at the box office, Scarlett Johansson’s star
power proved to be bigger than The Rock and her movie, Lucy, took the box
office crown. This development, piled onto the revelation that statistics
showed that women came out to see this sci-fi actioner, seemed to shock a great
many in the mainstream media. Could this mean that there is a market for more
films headlining women? While I would try not to take offense on anyone’s
behalf from the sheer stupidity of the question, I fear that I must confess to
not just disliking this film, but outright finding it offensive.
If the movie were
simply a stupid summer flick, that would be disappointing but unremarkable. The
film was aiming for something more ambitious, which is usually something I
admire even when it fails spectacularly. The problem is that however grand its
ambitions were, there was an even greater amount of laziness put in, mainly
from filmmaker Luc Besson. Bear in mind that Besson has never shown quite so
much ambition as he does here, though arguably close with his classic film The
Fifth Element. Yet the results of the film show that he failed his talented
actress on nearly every level. Here are a few places:
(SPOILER ALERT FROM HERE ON)
1
1) Let’s start with the most obvious: Lucy’s story
and plot are absolutely dumb. There is so much to say about the stupidity of
this story, I’ll try to stay on the big items. First, the whole Korean mob plot
is half-hearted and provides for a false sense of either urgency or action.
They don’t explain why the mob would be so wreckless in getting back the drugs
that they would risk a war with Paris police, considering that they implied
that the bags given to the mules was part of a larger operation. They could
just make more, which would be a whole lot safer than exposing themselves to
international law enforcement. And how does that effect the end result of the
film besides padding out the running time? The game clock isn’t when the mob
catches her, but when her body will die due to overexposure to the drug. The
mob plot is pointless since we know they can do nothing to harm her. And what
exactly did Morgan Freeman do in the entire film besides give crackpot
lectures? Why was is so important to get to him in Paris in the first place
when she could’ve done what she did at her local school and had him come to her
instead?
2
2) Lucy’s character is poorly created. This is by
no means Johansson’s fault. She clearly was trying to create a complex
character and simply had nothing to work with. Here’s what we know of Lucy
prior to the movie: She’s a young American college girl in Korea who lives in a
pad with her equally young and naïve roommate who both enjoy partying a little
too much. That’s it. When the drug
affects her, the first to go is her humanity, diminishing her personality and
turns her into a machine. We don’t even see a fight between her human side and
the robot. If this is intentional, then why not allow other characters to react
to the strangeness of her behavior in ways that show the widening divide
between her and the rest of humanity?
Instead, we’re treated to title cards showing her perceived cerebral
capacity.
3) Lucy’s powers are not consistent nor do they
make much sense. So let’s get this straight, it’s a cool idea to have a character
that is in tuned with every cell and atom on the planet, to see data streams
(though that was better done in the short lived show Alphas), to be able to finagle
frequencies and control others through molecule manipulation. But the movie
shows her being able to control and see from halfway around the world. She
could tell what was on the French policeman’s desk, but not exactly where all
three mules were at that very moment? I can buy a superhero being able to turn
a TV into a two-way communication device, but the film wants to treat Lucy’s
abilities seriously yet doesn’t communicate clearly how she’s doing the things
she does.
4
4) Let’s talk about Lucy’s science. I’m reminded of
the scene in Transformers 2 when Sam proclaimed that Einstein was wrong about
FTL travel and how offended I was that a popcorn movie would shrug off
scientific thinking just to set up a magical alternative. The science behind
Lucy’s mental abilities reeks of a quick Wikipedia write-off to excuse poor
setup and payoff. Even with higher mental functions, at what range do her
abilities work? If everything is interconnected, how would you be able to
manipulate indefinitely? Would there be any consequence to the usage of such
energy? Even Morgan Freeman is going off hypotheses or the crackpot variation,
yet other scientists never challenge his observations or call him out. But then
I guess looking and sounding like Morgan Freeman could be rather intimidating.
And this guy has a show that’s all about scientific questioning…
5
5) If you take out the Morgan Freeman lecture scenes
and the needless Korean mob scenes, the film would be about 20 minutes long. This
is why there are so many needless scenes in the film. This was a short film at
best and still a bad one at that. Besson needed to put enough action to make it
onto the trailer, but none of it is important to the story nor have any stakes.
The visual metaphors are redundant because Johansson is doing her job
perfectly, so we didn’t need to know how she was feeling with images of lions
stalking prey. But again, for it to classify as a feature film, it needed
stuffing .
Scarlett Johansson is a truly gifted actor that deserves to
be put in films that allow her to shine. Lucy could have been that film if it
had created a character for her that she could do something with and then give
her situations where she could do something fantastic. She can do action as we’ve
seen in her Black Widow role. She can do intimate drama as shown in Lost in
Translation and Girl with the Pearl Earring. She can even do comedy as see in
Don Jon and Ghost World. And even more exhilarating is that she’s willing to
step out of her comfort zones, experiment and even fail. But Lucy is not her
fault. No doubt the success of this movie will encourage her to try again and I
certainly can’t wait. But next time I hope the material is worthy of her
performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment